Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Reforestation less cost-effective than reducing emissions

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 04:21, 28 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Professor John Shepherd, director of Britain's Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, said in 2001, "Our view is that the argument is being diverted into what is really a rather unproductive area and people should get back to talking about carbon emission reductions at source by use of renewable (fuels) and whatever else they think is necessary."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.