Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Plea bargaining in exchange for testimony is the best way to achieve broader justice and desert

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

YOU CAN BECOME AN EDITOR OF THIS PAGE. DEBATEPEDIA IS A WIKI THAT ANYONE CAN EDIT! BE BOLD, CLICK EDIT, AND HELP MAKE THIS PAGE INTO A VALUABLE PUBLIC RESOURCE THAT THOUSANDS WILL READ. SEE THE GETTING STARTED TUTORIAL.

Argument's parent debate

Argument case

In some cases, a defendant may be culpable in one criminal matter, but have information that would help in prosecuting a broader or more significant matter. In such a case, prosecutors may agree to reduced charges or sentencing in the first matter, in exchange for the defendant's cooperation (e.g. testimony) in prosecuting the larger matter. This is a good example of broader social justice or due desert being achieved through plea bargaining in exchange for testimony.

See also

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.